Part 1 | Part 2| Part 3 | Part 4
In God of the Oppressed (1975), James Cone first laid the groundwork for his arguments that 1) theology cannot be separated from the social context of the theologian, and 2) God is revealed in historical events like the Exodus and the life and death of Jesus as the Liberator of the oppressed.
The problem then becomes: How do we make sure the things we say about God are actually true, and not just what we want them to be? If theology is contingent and God’s revelation is historical, how do we guard against lapsing into creating God in our image – a common critique of belief since Feuerbach.
Or, as Cone himself puts it, “To what extent is the God of Black Theology limited to the biological origin of its advocates?” (p. 84)